내무장관, 프리티 파텔, has approved the extradition of Mike Lynch, the tech entrepreneur once hailed as Britain’s answer to Bill Gates, to the US to answer criminal fraud charges.
On Friday night, his lawyers said he would appeal.
Earlier in the day, Hewlett-Packard won its six-year civil fraud case against Lynch after a high court judge ruled that he duped the US firm into overpaying for his software firm Autonomy, sold to HP for $11bn (£8.2bn) 에 2011.
Lynch was found to have defrauded HP by manipulating Autonomy’s accounts to inflate the value of the company. He has always denied the accusation and said on Friday that he would appeal.
But the outcome of the trial also coincided with a deadline for Patel to decide whether Lynch could be extradited to the US. 이번주 초, he lost a high court bid that would have given Patel more time to decide.
He could now be sent to the US to face criminal trial for 14 counts of conspiracy and fraud over claims that investors in HP lost billions due to his actions. Lynch’s lawyer, Chris Morvillo of Clifford Chance, said on Friday night: “Dr Lynch firmly denies the charges brought against him in the US and will continue to fight to establish his innocence. He is a British citizen who ran a British company in Britain subject to British laws and rules and that is where the matter should be resolved. This is not the end of the battle — far from it. Dr Lynch will now file an appeal to the high court in London.”
금요일 일찍, after a 93-day high court trial, Mr Justice Hildyard found that Lynch had defrauded HP.
“Claimants have substantially succeeded in their claims in this proceeding,” said the judge.
He said the damages were likely to be significantly less than the $5bn claimed by Hewlett-Packard (HP) and its successor companies, while he also cast doubt on the reliability of some of the US firm’s witnesses.
But he ruled that HP had been induced into overpaying for the takeover, due to fraud perpetrated by Lynch and Autonomy’s former finance director Sushovan Hussain, WHO is in jail in the US after being found guilty of fraud relating to the same deal.
The US company bought Autonomy for $11bn in 2011, targeting its software that helps firms store and search “unstructured data” such as voicemail and email. Lynch made £500m from the sale and was hailed as one of Britain’s few global tech champions.
Within a year, HP had written down its own value by $9bn, blaming “serious accounting improprieties” related to the deal. Lynch and his team, HP claimed, had falsely boosted the attractiveness of the company through accounting trickery.
In a lengthy summary of his conclusions, Mr JuHildyard found that Lynch and Hussain had been “dishonest”, deploying several strategies that had the effect of artificially inflating and bringing forward revenues.
This included using hardware sales to “disguise” shortfalls in software income, hiding costs, and entering into arrangements with “friendly” companies to bring forward revenue from sales, some of which never materialised, to meet market expectations.
하나, he said that HP would most likely still have bought Autonomy, even if its financial performance had not been artificially enhanced, due to the quality of its data-structuring product IDOL, described by former HP boss Meg Whitman as “almost magical”.
He also found that the scale of damages, which will be determined at a later date, was likely to be “considerably less” than the $5bn claimed by HP.
A London court ruled last July that Lynch, who denies any wrongdoing, should be extradited but the final decision rested with Patel. Her decision could reignite claims that extradition arrangements with the US unfairly favour American interests.
A US trial would cover much of the same ground as the London civil case.
Speaking after the high court verdict, a spokesperson for Hewlett-Packard Enterprise (HPE) 말했다: “Dr Lynch and Mr Hussain defrauded and deliberately misled the market and Hewlett-Packard. HPE is pleased that the judge has held them accountable.”
Kelwin Nicholls of Clifford Chance, lawyer for Lynch, 말했다: “Today’s outcome is disappointing and Dr Lynch intends to appeal. We will study the full judgment over the coming weeks.
“We note the judge’s concerns over the reliability of some of HP’s witnesses. We also note the judge’s expectation that any loss suffered by HP will be substantially less than the $5bn claimed.”