6 六月 1947
氏 George Marshall, secretary of state, speaking at Harvard University to-day, [5 六月] called on the countries of Europe to unite in planning their economic salvation and warned them that the United States cannot do much more to alleviate Europe’s plight until a joint programme has been agreed on by a number of European nations, if not by all of them. 彼は続けた:
Europe would require outside help for the next three or four years, but the remedy for European difficulties lay in restoring the confidence of the people in the economic future of their own countries and of all ヨーロッパ. 彼は続けた:
Mr Marshall described the world situation today as “very serious.” Reviewing the economic breakdown in Europe during and after the war, he said “The rehabilitation of the economic structure of Europe quite evidently will require a much longer time and greater effort than had been foreseen.”
Mr Marshall’s speech at Harvard is regarded here as marking the adoption as official United States policy of a much-discussed plan to put aid to European countries on a continental instead of an individual basis. The possibility of a speedy European response, possibly involving a European economic conference, is being discussed.
The speech is regarded by diplomatists as the most important creative policy pronouncement since the president proclaimed in March the Truman doctrine of aiding countries considered to be threatened by communism, and is interpreted as a positive constructive application of the doctrine.
America is seen as seeking to avert an economic collapse of Europe and an inevitable communist aftermath by encouraging the construction of a more closely integrated European economy. It is thought that without some such movement by European nations Congress will not appropriate any substantial funds for aid to Europe.
The Observer, 8 六月 1947
By A Student of Europe
13 六月 1947
ワシントン, 12 六月
Mr Marshall, secretary of state, made it clear at his press conference to-day that until European nations responded to his call to them to unite to formulate a scheme for restoring the continent’s economy he would make no further statements on the matter of any diplomatic approach. He repeatedly emphasised that the initiative must come from Europe. Mr Marshall said he meant to include both Britain and Russia when he used the term “Europe” in his Harvard speech. He meant “everything west of Asia.” Mr Marshall said Mr Churchill’s advocacy of a United States of Europe proposal had influenced him in developing his proposal.
Speaking at Long Beach, Mr Benjamin Cohen, a state department Counselor, said Europe might require up to £6,000,000,000 in outside assistance during the next four years to prevent starvation and check the danger of dictatorships. Mr Cohen, who is one of Mr Marshall’s leading advisers, made it plain that he thought Britain should share in whatever aid programmes were worked out to help Europe as a whole.
5 4月 1948
The great debate is over, and the Marshall plan has begun its work. On Friday both Houses of Congress approved the final form of the Foreign Assistance Bill; on Saturday the President signed it. Ships leaving New York to-day carry the first cargoes debited to the £1,325,000,000 which the United States will contribute in the coming 12 months towards the economic reconstruction of Europe. This weekend may prove to have been a turning point in the world’s history; 氏 Truman was not speaking with improper arrogance when he called the measure “perhaps the greatest venture in constructive statesmanship that any nation has ever taken.” It is the constructive, or reconstructive, aspect of the plan which must be grasped and remembered and followed.
The essence of Mr Marshall’s great conception proclaimed last June was that the united effort of the nations of Europe to rebuild their broken economies with each other’s help would call forth a generous response from the United States. ザ・ 16 nations have begun that task at Paris, and the American people has magnificently expressed its confidence in them to carry it through. For any nation to accept American aid as a substitute either for its own necessary effort or for full and unselfish cooperation with its neighbours would betray that confidence and invite a disastrous estrangement. Within our own sphere, all the economic problems which faced us a week ago are still there, flinty as ever: increased production, better distributed man-power, the dangers of rising costs and of creeping inflation. The Marshall plan gives us the chance to overcome these; not to escape from them. As Senator Vandenberg said in introducing the bill into the Senate, “Our dollars are no substitute for their own will.”
Now that it has come about, the Foreign Assistance Act seems almost miraculous.