The longstanding target for providing climate finance to the developing world will be met within two years, according to a report ahead of the UN 경찰26 climate summit.
But experts said it was “shameful” that developed countries were not doing more to help the poorest in the world, who were struggling with a climate crisis not of their making.
Rich countries agreed in 2009 that at least $100bn a year would be provided annually from public and private sector sources to the developing world by 2020, in order to help poor countries cut greenhouse gas emissions and cope with the impacts of the climate crisis.
That target has so far gone unmet, endangering the trust that developing countries have in the 2015 Paris climate agreement and jeopardising progress at the Cop26 talks, which open in Glasgow this Sunday.
The climate finance delivery plan published on Monday found that a shortfall remained between the finance likely to be provided this year and next year and the $100bn (£73bn) target, but that it would be closed by 2023 when new contributions that had already been pledged came into effect. 으로 2025, according to the plan, the amount flowing to developing countries should reach $117bn.
Alok Sharma, the UK cabinet minister who will preside over Cop26, 말했다: “The delivery plan sets out how developed countries will deliver the $100bn goal that has long been promised to developing nations. Scaling up climate finance has been one of my top priorities as Cop president. This plan recognises progress, based on strong new climate finance commitments. There is still further to go, but this plan provides clarity, transparency and accountability. It is a step towards rebuilding trust and gives developing countries more assurance of predictable support.”
No new money is likely to be forthcoming immediately under the delivery plan, though there are expectations of some new pledges by the end of this year.
More significantly for the poorest countries, at Cop26 there is likely to be a refocus of existing pledges to help them cope with the impacts of extreme weather. Much of the climate finance provided to date has gone to middle-income countries to help them cut emissions, through projects such as windfarms or solar panels that are already easy to fund as they produce a profit, so a focus on poorer countries will be a welcome departure for many at the Cop26 talks.
The Climate Finance Delivery Plan, compiled by the German and Canadian governments at the request of the UK as host of Cop26, found that more than $100bn would be provided from 2023 ...에 2025.
Mohamed Adow, the director of the Power Shift Africa thinktank in Nairobi, criticised the plan: “The $100bn of climate finance is not only a lifeline to poor and vulnerable communities on the frontline of a climate crisis they did not cause, it’s also the bare minimum that rich countries need to do to hold up their end of the bargain at Cop26. For more than 10 years they have been promising this climate funding would be provided and every year they delay and drag their feet.”
He pointed out that $100bn was less than the UK alone was spending on its HS2 rail link. “It’s utterly shameful and the deal announced today is still short despite the UK government trying to spin it as ‘mission accomplished’. Poor nations will not be conned and the leaders of the developed world need to pull their finger out and get this money on the table if Cop26 is going to be a success,”그는 말했다.
David Levai, a researcher at the IDDRI thinktank in Paris, 말했다: “This plan, which was an opportunity to reassure developing countries that their concerns were to be addressed, fails to do that. In a year when they face compounding crises – health, climate and debt – support is more crucial than ever. Developed countries need to answer calls to deliver what was promised, to increase funding for adaptation and to improve access. If not addressed urgently by the UK presidency, this issue risks toxifying the Cop when it opens next week.”
Teresa Anderson, a climate policy coordinator at ActionAid International, said loans, which have formed much of the climate finance already provided, were not good enough and grants were needed. “It is vital that climate finance comes in the form of grants. But we are seeing 71% of existing support being provided as loans. This is pushing climate-vulnerable communities, and the women and girls on the frontlines of the crisis, deeper into debt and poverty.”